Convoluted Conversations

Warning: Monstrous wierd ramblings ahead. Steer clear!

To me, I value conversations at three levels:

Raw Level

-Both party speaks
-Erratic transitions of conversation topics
-Splurging of unrelated information from each side
-No investigative questions asked (from ‘simple how was your day’s to dwelling deeper into a statement made by one party)
-Catalyst conversation for both parties (what inspired for one side to speak): Respective Selves

Intermediate level

-3/4 portion of the conversation is taken up by one party (Major) while the other listens (Minor)
-Most investigative questions (IQ) asked by Minor while a dabble here and there of such questions asked by Major
-Splurging of unrelated information mostly from Major
-Catalyst conversation for Major: Self and (IQs) from Minor
-Catalyst conversation for Minor: (IQs) from Major

Complemented Level

-Equal distribution of conversation weight between both parties (Half 1 and Half 2)
-Ample amount of IQs asked
-Catalyst conversation for Half 1: Half 2
-Catalyst conversation for Half 2: Half 1

Yet for each conversation session, the level would vary greatly from one to another but in the whole, the conversation is valued at which level it stayed on the most.